STATE OF GUJARAT vs KISUBHAI SONUBHAI BARDE Advocate - J V GAMIT — 94/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV130001052026

Filing Number

94/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

94/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUBIR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1219003250463

Police Station

SUBIR POLICE STATION - DANG DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

1.STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.KISUBHAI SONUBHAI BARDE Advocate - J V GAMIT

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 and Probation Act Section 66(1) for driving under the influence of alcohol, sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 200 (with 2 days' simple imprisonment in default) after he voluntarily confessed to the offense and submitted a plea considering his economic hardship as the sole earning member of his family. The court also ordered the confiscation of the vehicle and directed him to maintain bail bonds for six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
09-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
03-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 94/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 and Probation Act Section 66(1) for driving under the influence of alcohol, sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 200 (with 2 days' simple imprisonment in default) after he voluntarily confessed to the offense and submitted a plea considering his economic hardship as the sole earning member of his family. The court also ordered the confiscation of the vehicle and directed him to maintain bail bonds for six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.