STATE OF GUJARAT vs DINESHBHAI PUNYABHAI DESAI Advocate - J V GAMIT — 62/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV130000732026

Filing Number

62/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

62/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUBIR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11219003250265

Police Station

SUBIR POLICE STATION - DANG DISTRICT

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESHBHAI PUNYABHAI DESAI Advocate - J V GAMIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1) for drunk driving and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (rupees two hundred only) with simple imprisonment of 2 days as default. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, poor financial circumstances as the sole earner in his family, and the principles of justice, the court imposed a reduced sentence while ordering confiscation of the vehicle and a 6-month suspension of his driving privileges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1) for drunk driving and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (rupees two hundred only) with simple imprisonment of 2 days as default. Considering the accused's voluntary confession, poor financial circumstances as the sole earner in his family, and the principles of justice, the court imposed a reduced sentence while ordering confiscation of the vehicle and a 6-month suspension of his driving privileges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case