STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRADIPBHAI SANATBHAI GAVIT Advocate - J V GAMIT — 61/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV130000722026

Filing Number

61/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

61/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUBIR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11219003250385

Police Station

SUBIR POLICE STATION - DANG DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRADIPBHAI SANATBHAI GAVIT Advocate - J V GAMIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary The Surat Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 and Probation of Offenders Act Section 12(1) for driving under the influence of alcohol. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 200 (in lieu of which 2 days simple imprisonment) and ordered confiscation of the vehicle, considering the accused's poor economic circumstances and voluntary guilty plea. The accused was also directed to furnish a personal bond valid for six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Surat Judicial Magistrate convicted the accused under IPC Section 185 and Probation of Offenders Act Section 12(1) for driving under the influence of alcohol. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 200 (in lieu of which 2 days simple imprisonment) and ordered confiscation of the vehicle, considering the accused's poor economic circumstances and voluntary guilty plea. The accused was also directed to furnish a personal bond valid for six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case