STATE OF GUJARAT vs YASHVANTBHAI SUBHASHBHAI DESAI Advocate - S S DABKE — 27/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV130000382026

Filing Number

27/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

27/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, SUBIR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

112190032850368

Police Station

SUBIR POLICE STATION - DANG DISTRICT

Year

0

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.YASHVANTBHAI SUBHASHBHAI DESAI Advocate - S S DABKE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under Section 281 of the Indian Penal Code for a public nuisance offense and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (with two days' simple imprisonment as an alternative). The court found the accused's voluntary confession credible and considered his financial hardship and status as the sole earner in his family as mitigating factors to impose a lighter sentence than prescribed by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 281 of the Indian Penal Code for a public nuisance offense and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (with two days' simple imprisonment as an alternative). The court found the accused's voluntary confession credible and considered his financial hardship and status as the sole earner in his family as mitigating factors to impose a lighter sentence than prescribed by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case