STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAMABHAI MOTILALBHAI BARDE Advocate - S S DABKE — 3/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNV130000142026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, SUBIR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11219003250392
Police Station
SUBIR POLICE STATION - DANG DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAMABHAI MOTILALBHAI BARDE Advocate - S S DABKE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLEA
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PLEA | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 281 IPC for rash or negligent act and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (rupees two hundred only), with simple imprisonment for two days as an alternative. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, economic hardship as a poor family's sole earner, and case circumstances to impose a lenient sentence, ordering that confiscated property be returned to its rightful owner and bail bonds remain valid for six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 281 IPC for rash or negligent act and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 (rupees two hundred only), with simple imprisonment for two days as an alternative. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, economic hardship as a poor family's sole earner, and case circumstances to impose a lenient sentence, ordering that confiscated property be returned to its rightful owner and bail bonds remain valid for six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts