PARBHUBHAI KOYABHAI PATEL vs CHANDRAKANTBHAI MOHANBHAI PATEL Advocate - V R PATEL — 14/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJNV120011242025
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
14/2025
Filing Date
09-10-2025
Registration No
14/2025
Registration Date
09-10-2025
Court
Taluka Court, Khergam
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARBHUBHAI KOYABHAI PATEL
Adv. S C PATEL
NARESHBHAI THAKORBHAI PATEL
KIRANBHAI THAKORBHAI PATEL
Respondent(s)
CHANDRAKANTBHAI MOHANBHAI PATEL Advocate - V R PATEL
GANPATBHAI RAMABHAI PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 26-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 09-02-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 22-01-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
The Principal Civil Judge, Khergam has framed eight issues in this property dispute case (RCS No. 14/2025) to be decided. The issues focus on whether plaintiffs are the lawful owners in peaceful possession, whether the property is ancestral/joint family property, whether defendants acquired valid rights through sale agreements, and whether defendants unlawfully interfered with plaintiffs' possession. The case will proceed to trial to determine liability and the appropriate decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Civil Judge, Khergam has framed eight issues in this property dispute case (RCS No. 14/2025) to be decided. The issues focus on whether plaintiffs are the lawful owners in peaceful possession, whether the property is ancestral/joint family property, whether defendants acquired valid rights through sale agreements, and whether defendants unlawfully interfered with plaintiffs' possession. The case will proceed to trial to determine liability and the appropriate decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts