THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SNEHALBHAI S/O JASHVANTBHAI PREMABHAI TOPALIYA Advocate - S S PATEL — 148/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV120002352026

Filing Number

148/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

148/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Khergam

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822004250802

Police Station

KHERGAM POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SNEHALBHAI S/O JASHVANTBHAI PREMABHAI TOPALIYA Advocate - S S PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(1)b and 45(1) for illegal possession and consumption of alcohol, sentencing him to imprisonment and fine. The accused's plea of not guilty was rejected, and the court found the prosecution's evidence credible, particularly witness testimony and the seizure report, while dismissing the accused's defense arguments as unconvincing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 148/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(1)b and 45(1) for illegal possession and consumption of alcohol, sentencing him to imprisonment and fine. The accused's plea of not guilty was rejected, and the court found the prosecution's evidence credible, particularly witness testimony and the seizure report, while dismissing the accused's defense arguments as unconvincing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case