THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SURESHBHAI S/O NAGINBHAI JINABHAI DHO. PATEL Advocate - S P PATEL — 145/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1),. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNV120002322026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
145/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
145/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Taluka Court, Khergam
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11822004250816
Police Station
KHERGAM POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SURESHBHAI S/O NAGINBHAI JINABHAI DHO. PATEL Advocate - S P PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
LOK ADALAT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | LOK ADALAT | |
| 02-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary This Gujarat High Court judgment (FIR No. 145/2026) upholds the conviction of the accused under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, sections 5(1) and 6(1), finding the evidence credible and prosecution's case established beyond reasonable doubt. The court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the original sentencing while directing the accused to pay compensation of Rs. 100 to the victim under section 357(2) of the CrPC, with provisions for additional relief if required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This Gujarat High Court judgment (FIR No. 145/2026) upholds the conviction of the accused under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, sections 5(1) and 6(1), finding the evidence credible and prosecution's case established beyond reasonable doubt. The court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the original sentencing while directing the accused to pay compensation of Rs. 100 to the victim under section 357(2) of the CrPC, with provisions for additional relief if required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts