THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MAYANKBHAI RATILAL PATEL Advocate - S P PATEL — 141/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1),. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNV120002282026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
141/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
141/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Taluka Court, Khergam
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11822004260074
Police Station
KHERGAM POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MAYANKBHAI RATILAL PATEL Advocate - S P PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
LOK ADALAT
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | LOK ADALAT | |
| 02-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 55(1)(b) and 75(1) for illegal possession and consumption of alcohol, sentencing him to six months imprisonment and a fine of ₹100 (or additional imprisonment if fine unpaid). The court found the evidence of police seizure and the accused's own confession sufficiently proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 55(1)(b) and 75(1) for illegal possession and consumption of alcohol, sentencing him to six months imprisonment and a fine of ₹100 (or additional imprisonment if fine unpaid). The court found the evidence of police seizure and the accused's own confession sufficiently proved the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts