THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AJAYBHAI S/O ASHVINBHAI SHUKKARBHAI DESAI Advocate - S S PATEL — 135/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV120002222026

Filing Number

135/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

135/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Taluka Court, Khergam

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822004250922

Police Station

KHERGAM POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B,85(1)

Petitioner(s)

1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.AJAYBHAI S/O ASHVINBHAI SHUKKARBHAI DESAI Advocate - S S PATEL

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Judegement

The court convicted the accused under Sections 56(1) and 65(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for criminal intimidation and criminal intimidation by threat, sentencing him to imprisonment and imposing a fine. The court found that the accused had threatened and intimidated the complainant, and the evidence presented, including the FIR and witness statements, substantiated the charges against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
09-Mar-2026

Lok Adalat

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
02-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
02-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 135/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Sections 56(1) and 65(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for criminal intimidation and criminal intimidation by threat, sentencing him to imprisonment and imposing a fine. The court found that the accused had threatened and intimidated the complainant, and the evidence presented, including the FIR and witness statements, substantiated the charges against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.