THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VANRAJBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - J S GAMIT — 967/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNV110011092025
Filing Number
967/2025
Filing Date
19-Dec-2025
Registration No
967/2025
Registration Date
19-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGHAI
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11219007250429
Police Station
WAGHAI POLICE STATION - DANGS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VANRAJBHAI SHANKARBHAI CHAUDHARI Advocate - J S GAMIT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court acquitted the accused in a case involving alleged illegal possession and sale of foreign liquor under the Prohibition Act, 2023. The judgment found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution relied solely on police testimony without independent corroborating evidence, and failed to establish that the seized bottles belonged to the accused or contained original labels with intact seals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 967/2025
The court acquitted the accused in a case involving alleged illegal possession and sale of foreign liquor under the Prohibition Act, 2023. The judgment found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution relied solely on police testimony without independent corroborating evidence, and failed to establish that the seized bottles belonged to the accused or contained original labels with intact seals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts