THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AJITBHAI BHANGALBHAI DHUM Advocate - P R GAYAKWAD — 955/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNV110010952025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
955/2025
Filing Date
12-12-2025
Registration No
955/2025
Registration Date
12-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGHAI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11219007250551
Police Station
WAGHAI POLICE STATION - DANGS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
AJITBHAI BHANGALBHAI DHUM Advocate - P R GAYAKWAD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 28-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 25-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 12-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted the accused Ajitbhai Bhangalbhai Dhum of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 2023 (Section 66(1)(b)) and Motor Vehicles Act (Section 185), finding that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the five witnesses examined by the prosecution could not provide credible and consistent testimony, and critical evidence like the blood test report (Form-C) was not produced, rendering the case unsustainable and warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted the accused Ajitbhai Bhangalbhai Dhum of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 2023 (Section 66(1)(b)) and Motor Vehicles Act (Section 185), finding that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that the five witnesses examined by the prosecution could not provide credible and consistent testimony, and critical evidence like the blood test report (Form-C) was not produced, rendering the case unsustainable and warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts