THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VINESHBHAI SUBHASHBHAI PAWAR Advocate - U T MAHLA — 408/2025

JudegementView PDF

The court acquitted the accused Vinneshbhai Sushabhbhai Pavar of charges under IPC Sections 66(1)(b) and 65(1) (Prohibition of Alcohol Act) due to insufficient evidence, as the prosecution failed to establish the case with proper medical and procedural compliance. The court found that critical evidence regarding blood sample examination and proper chain of custody was not adequately established, and the defence's arguments regarding procedural irregularities could not be conclusively refuted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 408/2025