THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAMANBHAI IKALBHAI FADVALIYA Advocate - V M CHORYA — 51/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV110000532026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

51/2026

Filing Date

13-01-2026

Registration No

51/2026

Registration Date

13-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VAGHAI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11219007250556

Police Station

WAGHAI POLICE STATION - DANGS DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAMANBHAI IKALBHAI FADVALIYA Advocate - V M CHORYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

27-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

23-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Ramanbhai Iklbhai Fadvaliiya, in an illegal liquor possession case under the Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized IMFL bottles belonged to the accused or that they contained original labels with intact seals. The court noted that the conviction was based solely on police testimony (interested witnesses) without independent corroborating evidence, violating fundamental criminal law principles that require proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Ramanbhai Iklbhai Fadvaliiya, in an illegal liquor possession case under the Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized IMFL bottles belonged to the accused or that they contained original labels with intact seals. The court noted that the conviction was based solely on police testimony (interested witnesses) without independent corroborating evidence, violating fundamental criminal law principles that require proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VAGHAI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case