THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAMANBHAI IKALBHAI FADVALIYA Advocate - V M CHORYA — 51/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNV110000532026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
51/2026
Filing Date
13-01-2026
Registration No
51/2026
Registration Date
13-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGHAI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11219007250556
Police Station
WAGHAI POLICE STATION - DANGS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAMANBHAI IKALBHAI FADVALIYA Advocate - V M CHORYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Ramanbhai Iklbhai Fadvaliiya, in an illegal liquor possession case under the Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized IMFL bottles belonged to the accused or that they contained original labels with intact seals. The court noted that the conviction was based solely on police testimony (interested witnesses) without independent corroborating evidence, violating fundamental criminal law principles that require proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Ramanbhai Iklbhai Fadvaliiya, in an illegal liquor possession case under the Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized IMFL bottles belonged to the accused or that they contained original labels with intact seals. The court noted that the conviction was based solely on police testimony (interested witnesses) without independent corroborating evidence, violating fundamental criminal law principles that require proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts