THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HINABEN W/O PRAKASHBHAI PATEL Advocate - V M CHORYA — 46/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNV110000472026
Filing Number
46/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
46/2026
Registration Date
12-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VAGHAI
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11219007250538
Police Station
WAGHAI POLICE STATION - DANGS DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.HINABEN W/O PRAKASHBHAI PATEL Advocate - V M CHORYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused, Dhinaben Prakashbhai Patel, of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized IMFL bottles belonged to the accused or were in her possession. The judgment emphasizes that conviction cannot rest solely on police testimony without independent corroborating evidence, and that the prosecution bears the burden of proving its case conclusively rather than through conjecture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 46/2026
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused, Dhinaben Prakashbhai Patel, of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized IMFL bottles belonged to the accused or were in her possession. The judgment emphasizes that conviction cannot rest solely on police testimony without independent corroborating evidence, and that the prosecution bears the burden of proving its case conclusively rather than through conjecture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts