THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HINABEN W/O PRAKASHBHAI PATEL Advocate - V M CHORYA — 46/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV110000472026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

46/2026

Filing Date

12-01-2026

Registration No

46/2026

Registration Date

12-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VAGHAI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11219007250538

Police Station

WAGHAI POLICE STATION - DANGS DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

HINABEN W/O PRAKASHBHAI PATEL Advocate - V M CHORYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

27-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

05-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

26-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary The court acquitted the accused, Dhinaben Prakashbhai Patel, of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized IMFL bottles belonged to the accused or were in her possession. The judgment emphasizes that conviction cannot rest solely on police testimony without independent corroborating evidence, and that the prosecution bears the burden of proving its case conclusively rather than through conjecture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court acquitted the accused, Dhinaben Prakashbhai Patel, of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized IMFL bottles belonged to the accused or were in her possession. The judgment emphasizes that conviction cannot rest solely on police testimony without independent corroborating evidence, and that the prosecution bears the burden of proving its case conclusively rather than through conjecture. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VAGHAI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case