ANKIT SHRISHBHAI MAHETA vs M.M.PATEL — 5/2023
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 210. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 02nd April 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJNV070007732023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5/2023
Filing Date
08-06-2023
Registration No
5/2023
Registration Date
08-06-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, AHWA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANKIT SHRISHBHAI MAHETA
Respondent(s)
M.M.PATEL
SUNILBHAI
NAYANABEN VASAVA (PSI)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FOR REPORT POLICE INQUIRY
FOR REPORT POLICE INQUIRY
FOR REPORT POLICE INQUIRY
FOR REPORT POLICE INQUIRY
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | FOR REPORT POLICE INQUIRY | |
| 05-02-2026 | FOR REPORT POLICE INQUIRY | |
| 16-01-2026 | FOR REPORT POLICE INQUIRY | |
| 22-12-2025 | FOR REPORT POLICE INQUIRY |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Principal Civil Judge of Ahwa, Navsari dismissed an application under Section 156(3) CrPC seeking direction to register an FIR, holding that the application was not supported by a mandatory sworn affidavit as required by the Supreme Court's landmark judgment in Priyanka Srivastava. The court found the application not maintainable due to non-fulfillment of this essential statutory and judicially mandated procedural requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Principal Civil Judge of Ahwa, Navsari dismissed an application under Section 156(3) CrPC seeking direction to register an FIR, holding that the application was not supported by a mandatory sworn affidavit as required by the Supreme Court's landmark judgment in Priyanka Srivastava. The court found the application not maintainable due to non-fulfillment of this essential statutory and judicially mandated procedural requirement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts