SAROJBEN RAJESHBHAI BHOYE vs BAPUBHAI GONDUBHAI VANVI Advocate - U T MAHLA — 3/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Status: PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJNV070003142022
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3/2022
Filing Date
24-02-2022
Registration No
3/2022
Registration Date
24-02-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, AHWA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAROJBEN RAJESHBHAI BHOYE
Adv. R.P.LAKHAN
Respondent(s)
BAPUBHAI GONDUBHAI VANVI Advocate - U T MAHLA
KANCHANBEN BAPUBHAI VANVI
MILANBEN BAPUBHAI
SHITALBEN BAPUBHAI
TINABEN BAPUBHAI
RAMESHBHAI MULABHAI PAWAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE | |
| 07-02-2026 | PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE | |
| 17-01-2026 | PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE | |
| 24-12-2025 | PLAINTIFFS EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary RCS No. 3/2022 - Interim Injunction Application Allowed The court granted the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction under Order 39, Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC. The plaintiff established a prima facie case of an oral sale agreement for agricultural land in Ahwa, Dang, supported by a consent letter and ₹75,000 receipt. Finding that the plaintiff has been in possession since 2000 with substantial improvements, the court determined that the balance of convenience and risk of irreparable harm favor granting interim relief. The defendants are restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's possession or creating third-party rights until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary RCS No. 3/2022 - Interim Injunction Application Allowed The court granted the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction under Order 39, Rule 1 & 2 of the CPC. The plaintiff established a prima facie case of an oral sale agreement for agricultural land in Ahwa, Dang, supported by a consent letter and ₹75,000 receipt. Finding that the plaintiff has been in possession since 2000 with substantial improvements, the court determined that the balance of convenience and risk of irreparable harm favor granting interim relief. The defendants are restrained from interfering with the plaintiff's possession or creating third-party rights until final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts