Government of Gujarat vs VISHALBHAI DEVCHANDBHAI VAGHMARE Advocate - S C BARE — 28/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV070000362026

Filing Number

28/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

28/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, AHWA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11219030250346

Police Station

SAPUTARA POLICE STATION - DANGS DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VISHALBHAI DEVCHANDBHAI VAGHMARE Advocate - S C BARE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent act) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 with an alternative of two days' simple imprisonment. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, economic circumstances as the sole earner in his family, and case precedents to impose a reduced sentence while upholding the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 28/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent act) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹500 with an alternative of two days' simple imprisonment. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, economic circumstances as the sole earner in his family, and case precedents to impose a reduced sentence while upholding the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case