SUMANBEN SULUBHAI CHORYA vs BAPUBHAI GONDUBHAI GAVLI Advocate - U T MAHLA — 1/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJNV070000052020
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1/2020
Filing Date
23-01-2020
Registration No
1/2020
Registration Date
23-01-2020
Court
TALUKA COURT, AHWA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUMANBEN SULUBHAI CHORYA
Adv. R.P.LAKHAN
Respondent(s)
BAPUBHAI GONDUBHAI GAVLI Advocate - U T MAHLA
KANCHANBEN BAPUBHAI GAVLI W/O BAPUBHAI
Adv. I.U.JADAV
MILANBEN BAPUBHAI
Adv. I.U.JADAV
SHITALBEN BAPUBHAI
Adv. I.U.JADAV
TINABEN BAPUBHAI W/O KIRANBHAI
Adv. I.U.JADAV
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 07-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 17-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 24-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The court granted the plaintiff's application for interim injunction under Order 39, Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court restrained the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of disputed agricultural land (Survey No. 1311/2, Kotaba, Ahwa, Dang) and from creating any third-party rights over it until final disposal of the suit. The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case based on 19 years of continuous possession, investments in land improvements, and documentary evidence of agreement with the original owner, and that the balance of convenience favored granting interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted the plaintiff's application for interim injunction under Order 39, Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The court restrained the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession of disputed agricultural land (Survey No. 1311/2, Kotaba, Ahwa, Dang) and from creating any third-party rights over it until final disposal of the suit. The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case based on 19 years of continuous possession, investments in land improvements, and documentary evidence of agreement with the original owner, and that the balance of convenience favored granting interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts