ICICI BANK LIMITED AUTHORISED OFFICER PRASHANT SHISHODIA vs MAHEMAD FARUK ANSARI — 1088/2025
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION-JMFC
CNR: GJNV050038322025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1088/2025
Filing Date
25-11-2025
Registration No
1088/2025
Registration Date
25-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, CHIKHLI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ICICI BANK LIMITED AUTHORISED OFFICER PRASHANT SHISHODIA
Adv. B B MANIYA
Respondent(s)
MAHEMAD FARUK ANSARI
RUBI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
FINAL HEARING
FINAL HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 21-02-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 31-01-2026 | FINAL HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chikhli granted ICICI Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFESI Act, 2002, authorizing the bank to take possession of a mortgaged property (Khata No. 1917) owned by the borrowers who had defaulted on their loan. The court found that the bank had satisfied all statutory requirements, including serving the mandatory 60-day notice and considering borrower objections, and appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the possession with police assistance within 90 days upon deposit of Rs. 15,000 towards expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chikhli granted ICICI Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFESI Act, 2002, authorizing the bank to take possession of a mortgaged property (Khata No. 1917) owned by the borrowers who had defaulted on their loan. The court found that the bank had satisfied all statutory requirements, including serving the mandatory 60-day notice and considering borrower objections, and appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the possession with police assistance within 90 days upon deposit of Rs. 15,000 towards expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts