ICICI BANK LIMITED AUTHORISED OFFICER PRASHANT SHISHODIA vs MAHEMAD FARUK ANSARI — 1088/2025

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 10th April 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION-JMFC

CNR: GJNV050038322025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1088/2025

Filing Date

25-11-2025

Registration No

1088/2025

Registration Date

25-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, CHIKHLI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 Section 14,

Petitioner(s)

ICICI BANK LIMITED AUTHORISED OFFICER PRASHANT SHISHODIA

Adv. B B MANIYA

Respondent(s)

MAHEMAD FARUK ANSARI

RUBI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

10-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

ORDER/JUDGEMENT

09-03-2026

ORDER/JUDGEMENT

21-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

31-01-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
ORDER

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chikhli granted ICICI Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFESI Act, 2002, authorizing the bank to take possession of a mortgaged property (Khata No. 1917) owned by the borrowers who had defaulted on their loan. The court found that the bank had satisfied all statutory requirements, including serving the mandatory 60-day notice and considering borrower objections, and appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the possession with police assistance within 90 days upon deposit of Rs. 15,000 towards expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chikhli granted ICICI Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFESI Act, 2002, authorizing the bank to take possession of a mortgaged property (Khata No. 1917) owned by the borrowers who had defaulted on their loan. The court found that the bank had satisfied all statutory requirements, including serving the mandatory 60-day notice and considering borrower objections, and appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the possession with police assistance within 90 days upon deposit of Rs. 15,000 towards expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, CHIKHLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case