UMESHBHAI BHUPATRAY DESAI vs KIRITBHAI NATHUBHAI VAGHANI Advocate - B.A.BHANDARI — 11/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: Hearing On Injunction Application. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Hearing On Injunction Application Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJNV050034562023

Filing Number

11/2023

Filing Date

18-Aug-2023

Registration No

11/2023

Registration Date

18-Aug-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, CHIKHLI

Judge

2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UMESHBHAI BHUPATRAY DESAI

    Adv. T M VASHI

  2. 2.BUPATRAY RANCHANDRA DESAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KIRITBHAI NATHUBHAI VAGHANI Advocate - B.A.BHANDARI

  2. 2.BHARAT BHOJABHAI SOHALA

  3. 3.JIGNESH KEVAT @ J D BHARVAD

  4. 4.KALPESH PRAVINBHAI VAGHASIYA

    Adv. V.S.PATIL

  5. 5.NILESHBHAI KHIMAJIBHAI VAGHASIYA

    Adv. V.S.PATIL

  6. 6.MAHENDRA I BHAGAT

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The court rejected Defendant No. 1's application seeking dismissal of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiff adequately disclosed a cause of action by alleging fraud and forgery in the execution of two registered sale deeds using fabricated powers of attorney, and that the suit was filed within the limitation period after the plaintiff discovered the fraudulent deeds in January 2021. The court held that limitation and forgery issues are triable matters requiring evidence and cannot be decided at the threshold stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 06-Jan-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 14-Oct-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 03-Sep-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 23-Jul-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 11-Jun-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 02-Apr-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  13. 11-Feb-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  14. 24-Dec-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  15. 11-Dec-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 23-Oct-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 03-Sep-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  18. 25-Jun-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  19. 07-May-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  20. 06-Mar-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  21. 31-Jan-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  22. 27-Dec-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  23. 25-Oct-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  24. 12-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 18-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court rejected Defendant No. 1's application seeking dismissal of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiff adequately disclosed a cause of action by alleging fraud and forgery in the execution of two registered sale deeds using fabricated powers of attorney, and that the suit was filed within the limitation period after the plaintiff discovered the fraudulent deeds in January 2021. The court held that limitation and forgery issues are triable matters requiring evidence and cannot be decided at the threshold stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case