UMESHBHAI BHUPATRAY DESAI vs KIRITBHAI NATHUBHAI VAGHANI Advocate - B.A.BHANDARI — 11/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,. Status: HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJNV050034562023
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11/2023
Filing Date
18-08-2023
Registration No
11/2023
Registration Date
18-08-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, CHIKHLI
Judge
2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UMESHBHAI BHUPATRAY DESAI
Adv. T M VASHI
BUPATRAY RANCHANDRA DESAI
Respondent(s)
KIRITBHAI NATHUBHAI VAGHANI Advocate - B.A.BHANDARI
BHARAT BHOJABHAI SOHALA
JIGNESH KEVAT @ J D BHARVAD
KALPESH PRAVINBHAI VAGHASIYA
Adv. V.S.PATIL
NILESHBHAI KHIMAJIBHAI VAGHASIYA
Adv. V.S.PATIL
MAHENDRA I BHAGAT
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 09-03-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 18-02-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 06-01-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 18-11-2025 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The court rejected Defendant No. 1's application seeking dismissal of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiff adequately disclosed a cause of action by alleging fraud and forgery in the execution of two registered sale deeds using fabricated powers of attorney, and that the suit was filed within the limitation period after the plaintiff discovered the fraudulent deeds in January 2021. The court held that limitation and forgery issues are triable matters requiring evidence and cannot be decided at the threshold stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court rejected Defendant No. 1's application seeking dismissal of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiff adequately disclosed a cause of action by alleging fraud and forgery in the execution of two registered sale deeds using fabricated powers of attorney, and that the suit was filed within the limitation period after the plaintiff discovered the fraudulent deeds in January 2021. The court held that limitation and forgery issues are triable matters requiring evidence and cannot be decided at the threshold stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts