BAABARBHAI RADIYABHAI PATEL vs MAHESHBHAI DALUBHAI PATEL Advocate - S A PARMAR — 41/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 034,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 08th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJNV050012722017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
41/2017
Filing Date
10-08-2017
Registration No
41/2017
Registration Date
10-08-2017
Court
TALUKA COURT, CHIKHLI
Judge
2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BAABARBHAI RADIYABHAI PATEL
Adv. F A GADIWALA
CHATURBHAI RADIYABHAI PATEL
MANILAL RADIYABHAI PATEL
Respondent(s)
MAHESHBHAI DALUBHAI PATEL Advocate - S A PARMAR
BALVANTBHAI DALUBHAI PATEL
JAYESHBHAI CHHOTUBHAI PATEL
BHARATBHAI CHHOTUBHAI PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 06-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 27-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for possession, removal of encroachment, and permanent injunction regarding disputed agricultural land in Kakadvel village. The judge found that while the defendants illegally constructed houses on the plaintiffs' land (block 112), the defendants had maintained settled possession for 7-8 decades with the plaintiffs' knowledge, making the suit barred by the 12-year limitation period under the Limitation Act, Article 65. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for possession, removal of encroachment, and permanent injunction regarding disputed agricultural land in Kakadvel village. The judge found that while the defendants illegally constructed houses on the plaintiffs' land (block 112), the defendants had maintained settled possession for 7-8 decades with the plaintiffs' knowledge, making the suit barred by the 12-year limitation period under the Limitation Act, Article 65. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts