YUG KAMLESH CHAUDHARY vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 240/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJNV040025462025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

240/2025

Filing Date

20-12-2025

Registration No

240/2025

Registration Date

20-12-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BANSDA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822003250764

Police Station

VANSDA POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 406,420,
THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497,
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACT, 2000 Section 66D,

Petitioner(s)

YUG KAMLESH CHAUDHARY

Adv. D I PATEL

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

09-03-2026

Disposed

03-03-2026

FINAL HEARING

25-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

23-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

18-02-2026

FINAL HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
ORDER

The court rejected the applicant's application for interim custody of a seized VIVO V23 mobile phone (evidence in a fraud/IT Act case), finding it to be premature and improper. The court reasoned that the mobile contains valuable evidence currently undergoing forensic investigation at FSL, and releasing it to the applicant could compromise critical evidence and prejudice the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the applicant's application for interim custody of a seized VIVO V23 mobile phone (evidence in a fraud/IT Act case), finding it to be premature and improper. The court reasoned that the mobile contains valuable evidence currently undergoing forensic investigation at FSL, and releasing it to the applicant could compromise critical evidence and prejudice the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BANSDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case