YUG KAMLESH CHAUDHARY vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 240/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJNV040025462025

Filing Number

240/2025

Filing Date

20-Dec-2025

Registration No

240/2025

Registration Date

20-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BANSDA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822003250764

Police Station

VANSDA POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 406,420
The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497
Information Technology Act, 2000 Section 66D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YUG KAMLESH CHAUDHARY

    Adv. D I PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the applicant's application for interim custody of a seized VIVO V23 mobile phone (evidence in a fraud/IT Act case), finding it to be premature and improper. The court reasoned that the mobile contains valuable evidence currently undergoing forensic investigation at FSL, and releasing it to the applicant could compromise critical evidence and prejudice the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 16-Feb-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 07-Feb-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 04-Feb-2026

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 19-Jan-2026

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 20-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 240/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the applicant's application for interim custody of a seized VIVO V23 mobile phone (evidence in a fraud/IT Act case), finding it to be premature and improper. The court reasoned that the mobile contains valuable evidence currently undergoing forensic investigation at FSL, and releasing it to the applicant could compromise critical evidence and prejudice the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case