Government of Gujarat vs RAJESHBHAI RUPABHAI GAMIT Advocate - G U PATEL — 1123/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(A),125(B),106(1),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV040012882025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1123/2025

Filing Date

23-07-2025

Registration No

1123/2025

Registration Date

23-07-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BANSDA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822003250247

Police Station

VANSDA POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 281,125(A),125(B),106(1),
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 177,184,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAJESHBHAI RUPABHAI GAMIT Advocate - G U PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

09-03-2026

Disposed

17-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

06-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

26-11-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

04-11-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC at Vansda, Navsari acquitted defendant Rajshbhai Rupabhai Gamit of all charges under IPC sections 281, 125(a), 125(b), 106(1) and Motor Vehicles Act sections 177, 184. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the truck involved in the fatal accident on 01/03/2025, as witnesses could not identify the vehicle number or driver's name, and no credible evidence established the accused's reckless or negligent driving caused the death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC at Vansda, Navsari acquitted defendant Rajshbhai Rupabhai Gamit of all charges under IPC sections 281, 125(a), 125(b), 106(1) and Motor Vehicles Act sections 177, 184. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the truck involved in the fatal accident on 01/03/2025, as witnesses could not identify the vehicle number or driver's name, and no credible evidence established the accused's reckless or negligent driving caused the death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BANSDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case