RAJESH VASANT PATIL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 42/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 478,480. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJNV040004142026

Filing Number

42/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

42/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BANSDA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822003260296

Police Station

VANSDA POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 478,480
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),54,61(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH VASANT PATIL

    Adv. M C PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Vansda allowed the bail application of Rajesh Vashant Patil, arrested for non-bailable offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita 2023. The court rejected the prosecution's argument that he was a habitual offender, finding no prior convictions on record and noting his long-term Gujarat residence indicated he would appear for trial. The accused was granted bail upon furnishing Rs. 5,000 cash surety and Rs. 25,000 bail bond, with conditions including not committing similar offences, not leaving India without court permission, and disclosing immovable properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Vansda allowed the bail application of Rajesh Vashant Patil, arrested for non-bailable offences under the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita 2023. The court rejected the prosecution's argument that he was a habitual offender, finding no prior convictions on record and noting his long-term Gujarat residence indicated he would appear for trial. The accused was granted bail upon furnishing Rs. 5,000 cash surety and Rs. 25,000 bail bond, with conditions including not committing similar offences, not leaving India without court permission, and disclosing immovable properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case