PRANAVKUMAR SHANKARBHAI MAHALA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 34/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJNV040000852026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
34/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
34/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, BANSDA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRANAVKUMAR SHANKARBHAI MAHALA
Adv. B A DASONDI
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court approved the petitioner's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordering the return of ₹1,89,148.98 seized in a cybercrime case. The petitioner's Axis Bank account was debited with ₹15,52,100 through fraudulent online transfers, with funds dispersed across 16 different suspect bank accounts. The court found that the investigation officer confirmed the petitioner as the rightful victim entitled to possession of the seized funds, and as no FIR was filed and no other claimant appeared, the petitioner is entitled to recovery subject to specified conditions regarding the case's final outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court approved the petitioner's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordering the return of ₹1,89,148.98 seized in a cybercrime case. The petitioner's Axis Bank account was debited with ₹15,52,100 through fraudulent online transfers, with funds dispersed across 16 different suspect bank accounts. The court found that the investigation officer confirmed the petitioner as the rightful victim entitled to possession of the seized funds, and as no FIR was filed and no other claimant appeared, the petitioner is entitled to recovery subject to specified conditions regarding the case's final outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts