PRANAVKUMAR SHANKARBHAI MAHALA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 34/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJNV040000852026

Filing Number

34/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

34/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BANSDA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRANAVKUMAR SHANKARBHAI MAHALA

    Adv. B A DASONDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court approved the petitioner's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordering the return of ₹1,89,148.98 seized in a cybercrime case. The petitioner's Axis Bank account was debited with ₹15,52,100 through fraudulent online transfers, with funds dispersed across 16 different suspect bank accounts. The court found that the investigation officer confirmed the petitioner as the rightful victim entitled to possession of the seized funds, and as no FIR was filed and no other claimant appeared, the petitioner is entitled to recovery subject to specified conditions regarding the case's final outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 34/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court approved the petitioner's application under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordering the return of ₹1,89,148.98 seized in a cybercrime case. The petitioner's Axis Bank account was debited with ₹15,52,100 through fraudulent online transfers, with funds dispersed across 16 different suspect bank accounts. The court found that the investigation officer confirmed the petitioner as the rightful victim entitled to possession of the seized funds, and as no FIR was filed and no other claimant appeared, the petitioner is entitled to recovery subject to specified conditions regarding the case's final outcome. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case