BHARATKUMAR MANCHHARAN KHATRI vs DISTRICT COLLECTOR , NAVSARI Advocate - D.G.P — 65/2013
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 034,038. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJNV030001022013
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
65/2013
Filing Date
16-09-2013
Registration No
65/2013
Registration Date
16-09-2013
Court
TALUKA COURT, GANDEVI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHARATKUMAR MANCHHARAN KHATRI
Adv. J.V.PATEL
Respondent(s)
DISTRICT COLLECTOR , NAVSARI Advocate - D.G.P
CHEIF OFFICER
Adv. B.M.NAIK
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 19-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 29-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 08-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The plaint was dismissed and returned to the plaintiff under Order 7 Rule 10 of the CPC due to lack of jurisdiction. The court found that since the collector of Navsari was joined as a defendant, the matter falls outside its territorial jurisdiction and must be presented before the proper competent court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The plaint was dismissed and returned to the plaintiff under Order 7 Rule 10 of the CPC due to lack of jurisdiction. The court found that since the collector of Navsari was joined as a defendant, the matter falls outside its territorial jurisdiction and must be presented before the proper competent court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts