MAHMAD SAJID KADAR SHIAKH vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 1825/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC. APPLICATION-JMFC
CNR: GJNV020145832025
Filing Number
1825/2025
Filing Date
30-Dec-2025
Registration No
1825/2025
Registration Date
30-Dec-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11822021252277
Police Station
NAVSARI RURAL POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHMAD SAJID KADAR SHIAKH
Adv. V R MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court approved the petitioner's application under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023, granting conditional release of a seized vehicle (Unicorn two-wheeler) on bond. The court determined that retaining the vehicle in police custody was unjustified once the investigation concluded, and ordered its return to the registered owner subject to specified conditions, including non-transfer and proper documentation with photographs and counter-signatures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2026
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2026
Hearing
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1825/2025
Summary The court approved the petitioner's application under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code, 2023, granting conditional release of a seized vehicle (Unicorn two-wheeler) on bond. The court determined that retaining the vehicle in police custody was unjustified once the investigation concluded, and ordered its return to the registered owner subject to specified conditions, including non-transfer and proper documentation with photographs and counter-signatures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts