TRUTIK BHUPATBHAI SOLANKI P/W OF HILAN KESHUBHAI DOKAL (MUDDAMAL APP) vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 1422/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC. APPLICATION-JMFC
CNR: GJNV020113182025
Filing Number
1422/2025
Filing Date
06-Oct-2025
Registration No
1422/2025
Registration Date
06-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11822021250413
Police Station
NAVSARI RURAL POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TRUTIK BHUPATBHAI SOLANKI P/W OF HILAN KESHUBHAI DOKAL (MUDDAMAL APP)
Adv. N K PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court dismissed the applicant's petition requesting return of a seized vehicle. The court held that while the vehicle is the applicant's sole business asset, releasing it could facilitate further criminal activity given the serious charges (NDPS violations involving 20+ liters of contraband). The court noted that a new 2024 Gujarat ordinance prohibits vehicle release before final judgment and mandates government authorization for seizure disposal, making immediate release legally impermissible and premature absent proper forfeiture proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2026
Notice To Opponents
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Jan-2026
Notice To Opponents
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Dec-2025
Notice To Opponents
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Nov-2025
Notice To Opponents
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Nov-2025
Notice To Opponents
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1422/2025
Summary The court dismissed the applicant's petition requesting return of a seized vehicle. The court held that while the vehicle is the applicant's sole business asset, releasing it could facilitate further criminal activity given the serious charges (NDPS violations involving 20+ liters of contraband). The court noted that a new 2024 Gujarat ordinance prohibits vehicle release before final judgment and mandates government authorization for seizure disposal, making immediate release legally impermissible and premature absent proper forfeiture proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts