JAYDEV KANTILAL MISTRY P/W OF JIGNASHA KETANBHAI PATEL vs BIMALKUMAR ANILBHAI NAYAK Advocate - S.B.NAIK G/273/2014 — 8802/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNV020108522025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
8802/2025
Filing Date
15-09-2025
Registration No
8802/2025
Registration Date
15-09-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JAYDEV KANTILAL MISTRY P/W OF JIGNASHA KETANBHAI PATEL
Adv. Y V BHILARE
Respondent(s)
BIMALKUMAR ANILBHAI NAYAK Advocate - S.B.NAIK G/273/2014
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT | |
| 29-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the case, finding that the accused and complainant had already settled their dispute through a settlement agreement, and the accused had paid the agreed compensation to the complainant. Since the matter was resolved between the parties, the court ordered that the case be disposed of accordingly under Section 13 of the relevant procedural law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the case, finding that the accused and complainant had already settled their dispute through a settlement agreement, and the accused had paid the agreed compensation to the complainant. Since the matter was resolved between the parties, the court ordered that the case be disposed of accordingly under Section 13 of the relevant procedural law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts