JAYDEV KANTILAL MISTRY P/W OF JIGNASHA KETANBHAI PATEL vs BIMALKUMAR ANILBHAI NAYAK Advocate - S.B.NAIK G/273/2014 — 8802/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV020108522025

Filing Number

8802/2025

Filing Date

15-Sep-2025

Registration No

8802/2025

Registration Date

15-Sep-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYDEV KANTILAL MISTRY P/W OF JIGNASHA KETANBHAI PATEL

    Adv. Y V BHILARE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIMALKUMAR ANILBHAI NAYAK Advocate - S.B.NAIK G/273/2014

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the case, finding that the accused and complainant had already settled their dispute through a settlement agreement, and the accused had paid the agreed compensation to the complainant. Since the matter was resolved between the parties, the court ordered that the case be disposed of accordingly under Section 13 of the relevant procedural law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 13-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 15-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8802/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the case, finding that the accused and complainant had already settled their dispute through a settlement agreement, and the accused had paid the agreed compensation to the complainant. Since the matter was resolved between the parties, the court ordered that the case be disposed of accordingly under Section 13 of the relevant procedural law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case