THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AAFTAB SALIM ZARA Advocate - H S SALUNKE — 7017/2024

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV020090432024

Filing Number

7017/2024

Filing Date

11-Oct-2024

Registration No

7017/2024

Registration Date

11-Oct-2024

Court

CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822021241251

Police Station

NAVSARI RURAL POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AAFTAB SALIM ZARA Advocate - H S SALUNKE

  2. 2.FAIJAN VAIYADKHAN PATHAN

    Adv. H S SALUNKE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Navsari acquitted two accused (Aaftab Salim Zhara and Faizan Vaidkhan Pathan) of charges under IPC Section 303(2) and 54 (vehicle theft) on March 8, 2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution witnesses' testimonies lacked sufficient corroboration and contained contradictions, while the accused's defense remained credible and unshaken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 22-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 06-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 30-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 23-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 28-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 19-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 11-Nov-2025

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 13-Oct-2025

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 30-Sep-2025

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 12-Sep-2025

    Further Statement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 09-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 08-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  23. 22-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  24. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  25. 24-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  26. 06-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  27. 30-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  28. 17-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  29. 21-Dec-2024

    Plea

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  30. 18-Nov-2024

    Plea

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  31. 11-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 11-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7017/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Navsari acquitted two accused (Aaftab Salim Zhara and Faizan Vaidkhan Pathan) of charges under IPC Section 303(2) and 54 (vehicle theft) on March 8, 2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution witnesses' testimonies lacked sufficient corroboration and contained contradictions, while the accused's defense remained credible and unshaken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case