THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AAFTAB SALIM ZARA Advocate - H S SALUNKE — 7017/2024

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),54,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJNV020090432024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

7017/2024

Filing Date

11-10-2024

Registration No

7017/2024

Registration Date

11-10-2024

Court

CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822021241251

Police Station

NAVSARI RURAL POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 303(2),54,

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

AAFTAB SALIM ZARA Advocate - H S SALUNKE

FAIJAN VAIYADKHAN PATHAN

Adv. H S SALUNKE

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

09-03-2026

Disposed

05-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

24-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

03-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

28-01-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Navsari acquitted two accused (Aaftab Salim Zhara and Faizan Vaidkhan Pathan) of charges under IPC Section 303(2) and 54 (vehicle theft) on March 8, 2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution witnesses' testimonies lacked sufficient corroboration and contained contradictions, while the accused's defense remained credible and unshaken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Navsari acquitted two accused (Aaftab Salim Zhara and Faizan Vaidkhan Pathan) of charges under IPC Section 303(2) and 54 (vehicle theft) on March 8, 2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the prosecution witnesses' testimonies lacked sufficient corroboration and contained contradictions, while the accused's defense remained credible and unshaken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case