JIGNESH PRADIPBHAI PARIKH vs JYOTI AMIT PARIKH Advocate - P S RANA — 96/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 14th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJNV020086712025
Filing Number
96/2025
Filing Date
06-Aug-2025
Registration No
96/2025
Registration Date
06-Aug-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI
Judge
8-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JIGNESH PRADIPBHAI PARIKH
Adv. G M PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.JYOTI AMIT PARIKH Advocate - P S RANA
-
2.DHVIT AMIT PARIKH
Adv. P S RANA
-
3.MINOR SHLOK AMIT PARIKH
Adv. P S RANA
-
4.KRUPA PRADIPBHAI PARIKH
Adv. P S RANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court disposed of Regular Civil Suit No. 96/2025 by accepting a compromise deed (Exh-12) filed by both parties, who voluntarily settled their dispute and agreed to be bound by the agreed terms. A consent decree was ordered to be drawn accordingly, with no order as to costs and all pending applications to be disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2026
Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jan-2026
Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Nov-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Oct-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Sep-2025
Summons - Notice
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 96/2025
The court disposed of Regular Civil Suit No. 96/2025 by accepting a compromise deed (Exh-12) filed by both parties, who voluntarily settled their dispute and agreed to be bound by the agreed terms. A consent decree was ordered to be drawn accordingly, with no order as to costs and all pending applications to be disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts