DHANSUKHBHAI RANCHHODBHAI PATEL vs ISHVERBHAI PARBHUBHAI PATEL Advocate - N M PATEL — 20/2021
Case under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 6,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJNV020050402021
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
20/2021
Filing Date
09-02-2021
Registration No
20/2021
Registration Date
09-02-2021
Court
CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHANSUKHBHAI RANCHHODBHAI PATEL
Adv. S.R.CHODVADIYA
Respondent(s)
ISHVERBHAI PARBHUBHAI PATEL Advocate - N M PATEL
CHUNILAL PARBHUBHAI PATEL
Adv. N M PATEL
NALINIBEN PARBHUBHAI PATEL
Adv. N M PATEL
LAXMIBEN PARBHUBHAI PATEL
Adv. N M PATEL
DHIRUBHAI KESHVBHAI PATEL
Adv. N M PATEL
SURESHBAHI KESHVBHAI PATEL
Adv. N M PATEL
PREMLATABEN @LATA KESHVBHAI PATEL
Adv. N M PATEL
THKORBHAI PREMABHAI
Adv. N M PATEL
KALPABEN PREMABHAI
Adv. N M PATEL
KAVISH MAKKAN
Adv. N M PATEL
ASHIKA MAKKAN
Adv. N M PATEL
MAHESHBHAI JAYANTIBHAI SANGANI
Adv. N M PATEL
SHAILENDRA VIJAYBHAI PATEL
Adv. N M PATEL
TLATI CUM MANTRI, SARPOR GRAM PANCHAYAT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 29-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 06-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 15-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 07-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Principal Senior Civil Court, Navsari | RCS No. 20/2021 The petition seeking interim injunction and partition of property was dismissed. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish the three essential requirements for interim relief: (1) a prima facie case, (2) balance of convenience in petitioner's favor, and (3) risk of irreparable harm. The court noted the petitioner's 70-year delay in claiming inheritance rights and found insufficient evidence of the mother's exclusion from revenue records to warrant relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Principal Senior Civil Court, Navsari | RCS No. 20/2021 The petition seeking interim injunction and partition of property was dismissed. The court held that the petitioner failed to establish the three essential requirements for interim relief: (1) a prima facie case, (2) balance of convenience in petitioner's favor, and (3) risk of irreparable harm. The court noted the petitioner's 70-year delay in claiming inheritance rights and found insufficient evidence of the mother's exclusion from revenue records to warrant relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts