HANSABEN SHANTILAL PATEL (M- vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 324/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC. APPLICATION-JMFC

CNR: GJNV020030022026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

324/2026

Filing Date

25-02-2026

Registration No

324/2026

Registration Date

25-02-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822023240803

Police Station

MAROLI POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

HANSABEN SHANTILAL PATEL (M-

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

09-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
ORDER

The court granted the petitioner's application and ordered the return of two VIVO INDIA mobile phones (with IMEI nos. 865100052449313 and 865100052449305) seized in a criminal case, to be held in the petitioner's custody during the pendency of the case. The return was conditioned upon the petitioner furnishing a bond equal to double the value of the phones and adhering to specified conditions, including not selling, mortgaging, or transferring the devices and producing them whenever required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petitioner's application and ordered the return of two VIVO INDIA mobile phones (with IMEI nos. 865100052449313 and 865100052449305) seized in a criminal case, to be held in the petitioner's custody during the pendency of the case. The return was conditioned upon the petitioner furnishing a bond equal to double the value of the phones and adhering to specified conditions, including not selling, mortgaging, or transferring the devices and producing them whenever required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case