SHANAWAZ DULARE KHAN (M- vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 301/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC. APPLICATION-JMFC

CNR: GJNV020028482026

Filing Number

301/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

301/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822021252523

Police Station

NAVSARI RURAL POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANAWAZ DULARE KHAN (M-

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court granted the petitioner's plea for release of a vehicle (Moped TVS Apache 125) seized in a theft case under the Indian Penal Code. The court held that since the vehicle was registered in the petitioner's name and there was no evidence suggesting the vehicle would be used for further criminal activity, retaining it indefinitely in police custody was unjustified. The court ordered conditional release of the vehicle to the petitioner with specific restrictions on its use and instructions that the vehicle remain available for production before the court as needed during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 301/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted the petitioner's plea for release of a vehicle (Moped TVS Apache 125) seized in a theft case under the Indian Penal Code. The court held that since the vehicle was registered in the petitioner's name and there was no evidence suggesting the vehicle would be used for further criminal activity, retaining it indefinitely in police custody was unjustified. The court ordered conditional release of the vehicle to the petitioner with specific restrictions on its use and instructions that the vehicle remain available for production before the court as needed during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case