SHANAWAZ DULARE KHAN (M- vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 301/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC. APPLICATION-JMFC

CNR: GJNV020028482026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

301/2026

Filing Date

21-02-2026

Registration No

301/2026

Registration Date

21-02-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822021252523

Police Station

NAVSARI RURAL POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

SHANAWAZ DULARE KHAN (M-

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE

24-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

NOTICE TO OPPONENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court granted the petitioner's plea for release of a vehicle (Moped TVS Apache 125) seized in a theft case under the Indian Penal Code. The court held that since the vehicle was registered in the petitioner's name and there was no evidence suggesting the vehicle would be used for further criminal activity, retaining it indefinitely in police custody was unjustified. The court ordered conditional release of the vehicle to the petitioner with specific restrictions on its use and instructions that the vehicle remain available for production before the court as needed during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted the petitioner's plea for release of a vehicle (Moped TVS Apache 125) seized in a theft case under the Indian Penal Code. The court held that since the vehicle was registered in the petitioner's name and there was no evidence suggesting the vehicle would be used for further criminal activity, retaining it indefinitely in police custody was unjustified. The court ordered conditional release of the vehicle to the petitioner with specific restrictions on its use and instructions that the vehicle remain available for production before the court as needed during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case