DEVANSHI NIRAVKUMAR BHATT (CYBER) vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 233/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC. APPLICATION-JMFC
CNR: GJNV020019982026
Filing Number
233/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
233/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI
Judge
4-2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEVANSHI NIRAVKUMAR BHATT (CYBER)
Adv. B B DUDHAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The court ordered DCB Bank and Indian Bank to transfer frozen funds of Rs. 30,100 to the complainant's State Bank of India account (Ticket No. 31101260017583), as these funds were fraudulently transferred through cybercrime from the complainant's accounts at State Bank of India and Axis Bank. The court directed both banks to freeze the accounts permanently to prevent further fraud and instructed the Navsari Cyber Crime Police Station to coordinate with the banks for enforcement of this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 233/2026
Court Decision Summary The court ordered DCB Bank and Indian Bank to transfer frozen funds of Rs. 30,100 to the complainant's State Bank of India account (Ticket No. 31101260017583), as these funds were fraudulently transferred through cybercrime from the complainant's accounts at State Bank of India and Axis Bank. The court directed both banks to freeze the accounts permanently to prevent further fraud and instructed the Navsari Cyber Crime Police Station to coordinate with the banks for enforcement of this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts