KHORAJIYA IRSHAD MOHMAD (CYBER) vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 232/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC. APPLICATION-JMFC
CNR: GJNV020019972026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
232/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
232/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI
Judge
4-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KHORAJIYA IRSHAD MOHMAD (CYBER)
Adv. B B DUDHAT
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 4-2nd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-02-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court ordered Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. to transfer Rs. 10,000 (fraudulently transferred from the petitioner's Bank of Baroda account) back to the petitioner's account, and directed the bank to freeze the compromised account to prevent further fraud. The court found that the account was opened specifically for committing fraud and no account holder had objected to its freezing, making the relief warranted and just. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court ordered Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. to transfer Rs. 10,000 (fraudulently transferred from the petitioner's Bank of Baroda account) back to the petitioner's account, and directed the bank to freeze the compromised account to prevent further fraud. The court found that the account was opened specifically for committing fraud and no account holder had objected to its freezing, making the relief warranted and just. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts