BHOUTIK (LAMBO) SHAILESHBHAI PRAJAPATI (M- vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 175/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC. APPLICATION-JMFC

CNR: GJNV020013982026

Filing Number

175/2026

Filing Date

23-Jan-2026

Registration No

175/2026

Registration Date

23-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

8-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822022260070

Police Station

VIJALPORE POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

1.BHOUTIK (LAMBO) SHAILESHBHAI PRAJAPATI (M-

Respondent(s)

1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
20-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

Court Decision Summary The court granted the petitioner's appeal for custody of an Audi AG Q5 QUAT TDI 2.0 vehicle (Registration: GJ-21-AH-6271, Engine: CMG015991, Chassis: WAUZHD8R8EY700106) that was seized by police. The court found the petitioner was the registered owner and directed police to return the vehicle subject to specified conditions, including that the vehicle not be sold, transferred, or used for unlawful purposes, and that it be produced before the court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
20-Mar-2026

Disposed

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
09-Mar-2026

Hearing

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
25-Feb-2026

Hearing

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
10-Feb-2026

Hearing

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
06-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
23-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 175/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court granted the petitioner's appeal for custody of an Audi AG Q5 QUAT TDI 2.0 vehicle (Registration: GJ-21-AH-6271, Engine: CMG015991, Chassis: WAUZHD8R8EY700106) that was seized by police. The court found the petitioner was the registered owner and directed police to return the vehicle subject to specified conditions, including that the vehicle not be sold, transferred, or used for unlawful purposes, and that it be produced before the court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.