PINALBEN SHIVKUMAR RATHOD (M- vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 172/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC. APPLICATION-JMFC

CNR: GJNV020013892026

Filing Number

172/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

172/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822021252523

Police Station

NAVSARI RURAL POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PINALBEN SHIVKUMAR RATHOD (M-

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court granted the petitioner's request to recover gold ornaments and cash seized during a police investigation. The court found that the seized items—a gold bracelet (20.9 grams valued at ₹34,270) and ₹20,000 in cash—belong solely to the petitioner and ordered their return, subject to certain conditions including maintaining the status quo and not removing the items without court permission until trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 172/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted the petitioner's request to recover gold ornaments and cash seized during a police investigation. The court found that the seized items—a gold bracelet (20.9 grams valued at ₹34,270) and ₹20,000 in cash—belong solely to the petitioner and ordered their return, subject to certain conditions including maintaining the status quo and not removing the items without court permission until trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case