RUTURAJBHAI JOGABHAI vs SUREKHABEN SANJAYBHAI HALPATI — 693/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNV020008462026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
693/2026
Filing Date
17-01-2026
Registration No
693/2026
Registration Date
17-01-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, NAVSARI
Judge
8-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RUTURAJBHAI JOGABHAI
Respondent(s)
SUREKHABEN SANJAYBHAI HALPATI
Hearing History
Judge: 8-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 31-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Navsari convicted the accused, Surekhabhen Sanjayabhai Halpati, under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing contraband liquor without proper permit. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime in court, which the judge found credible and admissible. Considering the accused's poor economic circumstances, remorse, and the voluntary confession, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a ₹200 fine with an alternative of 3 days simple imprisonment, rather than the mandatory minimum punishment prescribed by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Navsari convicted the accused, Surekhabhen Sanjayabhai Halpati, under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing contraband liquor without proper permit. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime in court, which the judge found credible and admissible. Considering the accused's poor economic circumstances, remorse, and the voluntary confession, the court imposed a lenient sentence of a ₹200 fine with an alternative of 3 days simple imprisonment, rather than the mandatory minimum punishment prescribed by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts