Government of Gujarat vs JIGARBHAI ALIAS BHAYLU MANUBHAI RATHOD Advocate - J R PATEL — 12/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 64(2)(I)(M),65(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th March 2026.

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE -\PCSO

CNR: GJNV010026212025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

12/2025

Filing Date

28-08-2025

Registration No

12/2025

Registration Date

28-08-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

3-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822021251248

Police Station

NAVSARI RURAL POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 64(2)(I)(M),65(1)
PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 Section 4,6,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. B.G.GUPTA -PP[1]-(G/PP)

Respondent(s)

JIGARBHAI ALIAS BHAYLU MANUBHAI RATHOD Advocate - J R PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 3-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

20-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

28-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

16-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused Jigarbhai (Bhaylu) Manubhai Rathod of charges under sections 64(2)(I)(M) and 65(1) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita 2023 and sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged offense, thereby demolishing the essential element of the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Jigarbhai (Bhaylu) Manubhai Rathod of charges under sections 64(2)(I)(M) and 65(1) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita 2023 and sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged offense, thereby demolishing the essential element of the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT COURT, NAVSARI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case