Government of Gujarat vs JIGARBHAI ALIAS BHAYLU MANUBHAI RATHOD Advocate - J R PATEL — 12/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 64(2)(I)(M),65(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

PCSO - SPECIAL CASE -\PCSO

CNR: GJNV010026212025

Filing Number

12/2025

Filing Date

28-Aug-2025

Registration No

12/2025

Registration Date

28-Aug-2025

Court

DISTRICT COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

3-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822021251248

Police Station

NAVSARI RURAL POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 64(2)(I)(M),65(1)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 4,6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. B.G.GUPTA -PP[1]-(G/PP)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JIGARBHAI ALIAS BHAYLU MANUBHAI RATHOD Advocate - J R PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused Jigarbhai (Bhaylu) Manubhai Rathod of charges under sections 64(2)(I)(M) and 65(1) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita 2023 and sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged offense, thereby demolishing the essential element of the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. District Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. District Judge

  6. 28-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  11. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  12. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  13. 26-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  14. 24-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  15. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  16. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  17. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  18. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  19. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  20. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  21. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  22. 14-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  23. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  24. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  25. 23-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  26. 22-Sep-2025

    Framing Of Charge/Plea

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  27. 17-Sep-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  28. 15-Sep-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  29. 01-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 28-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Jigarbhai (Bhaylu) Manubhai Rathod of charges under sections 64(2)(I)(M) and 65(1) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita 2023 and sections 4 and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the victim was a minor at the time of the alleged offense, thereby demolishing the essential element of the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case