AJAY S/O BALUBHAI MAGANBHAI DHO. PATEL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - PP — 272/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINALMISCAPPLICATIONSESSION

CNR: GJNV010006672026

Filing Number

272/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

272/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822009260258

Police Station

CHIKHLI POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJAY S/O BALUBHAI MAGANBHAI DHO. PATEL

    Adv. D H PATHAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Principal District & Sessions Court at Navsari, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, granted bail to applicant Ajay S/O Balubhai Maganbhai Patel in CRMA S/272/2026. The court found that the charges under Prohibition Act and related laws were prima facie established, but the applicant qualified for regular bail subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation, monthly police station reporting, furnishing personal bonds of ₹50,000, and maintaining a fixed residence without leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 272/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Principal District & Sessions Court at Navsari, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, granted bail to applicant Ajay S/O Balubhai Maganbhai Patel in CRMA S/272/2026. The court found that the charges under Prohibition Act and related laws were prima facie established, but the applicant qualified for regular bail subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation, monthly police station reporting, furnishing personal bonds of ₹50,000, and maintaining a fixed residence without leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case