AJAY S/O BALUBHAI MAGANBHAI DHO. PATEL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - PP — 272/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINALMISCAPPLICATIONSESSION
CNR: GJNV010006672026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
272/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
272/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, NAVSARI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11822009260258
Police Station
CHIKHLI POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AJAY S/O BALUBHAI MAGANBHAI DHO. PATEL
Adv. D H PATHAK
Respondent(s)
Government of Gujarat Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Disposed
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Court at Navsari, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, granted bail to applicant Ajay S/O Balubhai Maganbhai Patel in CRMA S/272/2026. The court found that the charges under Prohibition Act and related laws were prima facie established, but the applicant qualified for regular bail subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation, monthly police station reporting, furnishing personal bonds of ₹50,000, and maintaining a fixed residence without leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Court at Navsari, under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, granted bail to applicant Ajay S/O Balubhai Maganbhai Patel in CRMA S/272/2026. The court found that the charges under Prohibition Act and related laws were prima facie established, but the applicant qualified for regular bail subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation, monthly police station reporting, furnishing personal bonds of ₹50,000, and maintaining a fixed residence without leaving India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts