ARJUNSINH MOHANSINH SOLANKI vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - T.C.SULE - DGP[1]-(G/PP) — 269/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINALMISCAPPLICATIONSESSION
CNR: GJNV010006642026
Filing Number
269/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
269/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
DISTRICT COURT, NAVSARI
Judge
3-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11201018260011
Police Station
CID CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION - GANDHINAGAR DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARJUNSINH MOHANSINH SOLANKI
Adv. V R MISHRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - T.C.SULE - DGP[1]-(G/PP)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Navsari has dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by the accused Arjunsinh Mohansinh Solanki in FIR No. 2869/2025. The court found that the accusations against the accused—including bribery, data manipulation, and conspiracy involving airport boarding procedures—are serious in nature, and the accused's close family ties and stable residence do not sufficiently mitigate the risk of tampering with evidence or witnesses during the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge
-
20-Mar-2026
Order
Addl. District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Addl. District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 269/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Navsari has dismissed the anticipatory bail petition filed by the accused Arjunsinh Mohansinh Solanki in FIR No. 2869/2025. The court found that the accusations against the accused—including bribery, data manipulation, and conspiracy involving airport boarding procedures—are serious in nature, and the accused's close family ties and stable residence do not sufficiently mitigate the risk of tampering with evidence or witnesses during the ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts