VINOD JAGRAM CHANDAN KAHAR vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - PP — 267/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINALMISCAPPLICATIONSESSION

CNR: GJNV010006622026

Filing Number

267/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

267/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822009260284

Police Station

CHIKHLI POLICE STATION - NAVSARI DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VINOD JAGRAM CHANDAN KAHAR

    Adv. M A BHAVSAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Court at Navsari granted bail to applicant Vinod Jagram Chandan Kahar under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, finding no legal grounds to deny bail. The court noted the applicant had no prior criminal history, the investigation was ongoing with co-accused still to be arrested, and prolonged detention would constitute pre-trial conviction, making bail release justified based on established judicial principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 267/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Court at Navsari granted bail to applicant Vinod Jagram Chandan Kahar under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, finding no legal grounds to deny bail. The court noted the applicant had no prior criminal history, the investigation was ongoing with co-accused still to be arrested, and prolonged detention would constitute pre-trial conviction, making bail release justified based on established judicial principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case