ANKITKUMAR JAYANTILAL PATEL vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - B.D. RATHOD -PP[1]-(G/PP) — 241/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINALMISCAPPLICATIONSESSION

CNR: GJNV010003682026

Filing Number

241/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

241/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

3-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11822004260015

Police Station

KHERGAM POLICE STATION - NAVSARI\ DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

1.ANKITKUMAR JAYANTILAL PATEL

Adv. A U SOLA

Respondent(s)

1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - B.D. RATHOD -PP[1]-(G/PP)

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
20-Mar-2026

JudegementView PDF

The Additional District Judge of Navsari rejected the anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 of the CrPC by the accused, finding that serious allegations of financial fraud involving Rs. 8,37,251 through a cooperative loan scheme were prima facie established and the investigation remained incomplete, making the accused's custodial interrogation necessary for fair investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
20-Mar-2026

Disposed

Addl. District Judge
17-Mar-2026

Order

Addl. District Judge
16-Mar-2026

Hearing

Addl. District Judge
12-Mar-2026

Hearing

Addl. District Judge
09-Mar-2026

Hearing

Addl. District Judge
05-Mar-2026

Hearing

Addl. District Judge
02-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
27-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 241/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Judge of Navsari rejected the anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 of the CrPC by the accused, finding that serious allegations of financial fraud involving Rs. 8,37,251 through a cooperative loan scheme were prima facie established and the investigation remained incomplete, making the accused's custodial interrogation necessary for fair investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.