MAGANBHAI BABUBHAI RATHOD vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - PP — 185/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINALMISCAPPLICATIONSESSION

CNR: GJNV010002992026

Filing Number

185/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

185/2026

Registration Date

19-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

3-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAGANBHAI BABUBHAI RATHOD

    Adv. N B NAIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - PP (Public Prosecutor)

  2. 2.THE DISTRICT VIGILANCE OFFICER AND COLLECTOR SHREE NAVSARI

  3. 3.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT

  4. 4.POLICE INSPECTOR SHREE, NAVSARI RURAL POLICE STATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Navsari disposed of Criminal Miscellaneous (Anti-Bail) Application No.185/2026 as withdrawn. The applicant's anticipatory bail application, filed before FIR registration, became defective once the FIR was registered (C.R.No.11822021260348), requiring fresh filing in accordance with the registered FIR. The applicant chose not to proceed with the present application and withdrew it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Addl.district & Sessions Judge

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 185/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Navsari disposed of Criminal Miscellaneous (Anti-Bail) Application No.185/2026 as withdrawn. The applicant's anticipatory bail application, filed before FIR registration, became defective once the FIR was registered (C.R.No.11822021260348), requiring fresh filing in accordance with the registered FIR. The applicant chose not to proceed with the present application and withdrew it accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case