NIRANJANBHAI RAJESHBHAI PATEL vs DHAVALKUMAR NARESHBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - D R PATIL — 11/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJNV010002082026

Filing Number

11/2026

Filing Date

04-Feb-2026

Registration No

11/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

DISTRICT COURT, NAVSARI

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIRANJANBHAI RAJESHBHAI PATEL

    Adv. N N PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHAVALKUMAR NARESHBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - D R PATIL

  2. 2.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. PP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Navsari allowed the criminal appeal and set aside the conviction for cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, acquitting the appellant after the parties settled the matter. The court exercised discretion under Section 320(5) of the CrPC and Section 147 of the NI Act to compound the offence, waiving costs based on the appellant's genuine efforts to settle despite circumstances beyond his control. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Navsari allowed the criminal appeal and set aside the conviction for cheque bounce under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, acquitting the appellant after the parties settled the matter. The court exercised discretion under Section 320(5) of the CrPC and Section 147 of the NI Act to compound the offence, waiving costs based on the appellant's genuine efforts to settle despite circumstances beyond his control. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case