Government of Gujarat vs JIGNESHBHAI BANSIBHAI BHIL Advocate - K J TADVI — 1647/2025

Judegement

Case Summary Court Decision: The court acquitted all five accused persons under sections 115(2), 324(4), 352, 351(2), and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS), finding insufficient evidence to prove the charges of criminal intimidation, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation with intent to cause injury. Key Reasoning: The complainant's testimony was the sole evidence, and while he acknowledged that a quarrel and scuffle occurred between both parties over a love relationship, he failed to specifically establish that the accused persons intentionally caused injuries or made threatening statements. The medical certificate was produced without the examining doctor being cross-examined, the injury report was not independently corroborated, and the complainant ultimately stated he had no grievance against the accused—both parties reconciled, with the disputed woman marrying one of the family members involved, and they now live peacefully together. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Final Arguments

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Final Arguments

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Final Arguments

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Final Arguments

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 1647/2025