Government of Gujarat vs SACHINBHAI GORDHANBHAI BHIL Advocate - U R TADVI — 1645/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 329(3),74,352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR060018282025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1645/2025
Filing Date
24-09-2025
Registration No
1645/2025
Registration Date
24-09-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823009250347
Police Station
GARUDESHWAR POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SACHINBHAI GORDHANBHAI BHIL Advocate - U R TADVI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 16-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused, Sachinbhai Gordhanbhai Bheel, of charges under IPC Sections 329(3), 74, 352, and 351(2). The complainant failed to substantiate her allegations of assault and criminal intimidation despite testifying, as her account lacked credible evidence and was contradicted by her own subsequent statement revealing the parties were in a consensual relationship for five years that later resulted in marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused, Sachinbhai Gordhanbhai Bheel, of charges under IPC Sections 329(3), 74, 352, and 351(2). The complainant failed to substantiate her allegations of assault and criminal intimidation despite testifying, as her account lacked credible evidence and was contradicted by her own subsequent statement revealing the parties were in a consensual relationship for five years that later resulted in marriage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts