Government of Gujarat vs Maheshbhai Vikrambhai Tadvi Advocate - J B TADVI — 1059/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 61,329(3),223,226,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJNR060012242025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1059/2025
Filing Date
06-08-2025
Registration No
1059/2025
Registration Date
06-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, GARUDESHWAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11823009250372
Police Station
GARUDESHWAR POLICE STATION- NARMADA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Maheshbhai Vikrambhai Tadvi Advocate - J B TADVI
Balubhai Sherabhai Tadvi
Pravinbhai Ranchhodbhai Tadvi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 20-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted all three defendants (Maheshbhai Vikrambhai Tadvi, Balubhai Sherabhai Tadvi, and Pravinbhai Ranchhodbhai Tadvi) of charges under IPC sections 61, 329(3), 223, and 226, finding insufficient evidence that they conspired to climb a mobile tower to make demands. The court found the complainant's testimony unreliable as he was not present during the incident and filed the complaint only at police insistence, lacking direct knowledge of the accused's intentions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted all three defendants (Maheshbhai Vikrambhai Tadvi, Balubhai Sherabhai Tadvi, and Pravinbhai Ranchhodbhai Tadvi) of charges under IPC sections 61, 329(3), 223, and 226, finding insufficient evidence that they conspired to climb a mobile tower to make demands. The court found the complainant's testimony unreliable as he was not present during the incident and filed the complaint only at police insistence, lacking direct knowledge of the accused's intentions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts